Trump's Immigration Policies and the Impact on Healthcare 2025: What Should We Know as Care Providers
As a health equity diversity and inclusion consultant, I’ve witnessed firsthand the impact policies have on healthcare access for historically marginalized populations.
I have pulled together this overview to hopefully shed some light on an evolving and complex topic healthcare providers must navigate in 2025, balancing their ethical obligations with new regulatory immigration policies.

(Disclaimer: This is a currently evolving topic and the information contained here should be a starting point for healthcare organizations and providers. This is NOT legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are ever-changing. Please verify all information is current before sharing. )
Healthcare, Immigration and Public Opinion
Recent polling shows we are a nation divided regarding healthcare and access:
52% of Americans believe healthcare should be accessible to all, regardless of immigration status (Pew Research, 2025).
48% support stricter measures to prevent undocumented immigrants from accessing non-emergency healthcare services.
This polarization reflects the ongoing national debate and underscores the challenges healthcare providers face in navigating these issues.
Recent Policy Changes
Rescinding of “Sensitive Zones” Protection
On January 22, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the rescinding of protections for “sensitive zones,” including hospitals and medical clinics. This policy change allows Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to conduct enforcement actions in these previously protected areas.
Impact:
Increased fear among undocumented immigrants, deterring them from seeking necessary medical care.
Potential public health risks as individuals avoid preventive care and treatment for infectious diseases.
There is increased anxiety among healthcare workers, who are caught between their duty to care and new enforcement realities.
Executive Orders on Immigration Enforcement
Recent executive orders have directed federal agencies to enhance the removal of undocumented immigrants and threatened to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities.
Impact:
Further restriction of undocumented immigrants’ access to federal benefits, including certain healthcare services.
Increased pressure on healthcare providers in sanctuary cities to comply with federal immigration enforcement or risk losing crucial funding.
Impact on Healthcare Access

Fear of Deportation
The presence of ICE in healthcare settings impacts care-seeking behaviors.
Evidence:
A 2025 study by the Urban Institute found a 30% decrease in preventive care visits among immigrant communities since the policy changes.
Maternal and infant mortality rates in immigrant-dense areas have seen a troubling uptick, with a 15% increase reported by the CDC in the past year.
Changes in Eligibility for Services
The administration has proposed expanding the definition of “public charge,” potentially making the use of non-cash assistance programs grounds for denying visas or green cards.
Impact:
Confusion and fear may be leading many immigrants to disenroll from or avoid enrolling in essential health programs, even when eligible.
A reported 25% decrease in enrollment in children’s health insurance programs among immigrant families (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2025).
Impact on Healthcare Providers
Compliance Requirements

Healthcare providers are now caught in a complex web of sometimes conflicting federal and state regulations.
Key Changes:
Mandatory reporting of suspected undocumented immigrants in some states, conflicting with patient confidentiality laws.
Increased audits of healthcare facilities to ensure compliance with new immigration enforcement cooperation requirements.
Funding Eligibility
Some federal healthcare grants now include clauses requiring cooperation with immigration enforcement.
Impact:
Ethical dilemmas for providers, forced to choose between funding and patient trust.
Reduced resources for community health centers and safety-net hospitals serving immigrant populations.
Legal Landscape & Healthcare
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) sets federal standards for patient privacy —no changes in immigration policy or enforcement priorities can nullify its protections without a formal legislative or regulatory process. However, a more aggressive enforcement environment may lead to:
Heightened requests from ICE for medical information.
Confusion or fear in immigrant communities about seeking care.
Ethical dilemmas for providers between patient trust and law enforcement requests.
Remember a healthcare provider's ability to share patient information with law enforcement (including ICE) is primarily governed by HIPAA and other federal regulations.
Permitted Disclosures Without Patient Authorization:
Court Orders/Subpoenas: Providers can share Patient Health Information (PHI) if presented with a valid (signed) court order, subpoena, or other legal mandate that meets HIPAA’s procedural requirements.
Law Enforcement Purposes: PHI can be disclosed to law enforcement in certain limited circumstances (e.g., to avert a serious threat to health or safety, to report certain injuries, or when required by law).
National Security: Disclosures to authorized federal officials for national security activities are permitted, though rarely invoked for routine immigration enforcement.
Minimum Necessary Standard: Even when disclosure is legally permitted, HIPAA generally requires you to share only the minimum necessary information to accomplish the purpose.
REMEMBER as healthcare providers we DO NOT collect Immigration Status:
HIPAA does not impose any duty on healthcare providers to proactively disclose or report a patient’s immigration status.
Immigration status is not part of routine patient identification for billing or clinical purposes, though some demographic questions (e.g., country of birth) may arise.
Ultimately, as healthcare providers, we must carefully balance legal obligations under HIPAA, ethical commitments to patient well-being, and any legitimate law enforcement mandates. Because this area is quickly becoming more complex—especially in times of changing policies—it is crucial for healthcare to have clear legal counsel, robust training, and updated compliance policies.
Comments